|
comments for: katie - 2007-07-27 [3:21 PM] Any thoughts on "Nineteen Years Later"? I found it profoundly unsatisfying...
blue - 2007-07-29 [8:30 AM] Oh yes, of course. It seemed tacked on and hardly necessary, although I understand that she wanted to close off the rest of Harry's life to prevent unauthorized sequels (although I'm not really sure it does that; nineteen years gives you plenty of room to manoeuvre). I just sort of ignored it, really. I've heard theories that it's really the prelude to her next books, featuring more precocious Potterlings. I'm not convinced, but I wouldn't complain if that were the case.
enter comments: Sorry, no HTML... just plain text. Play nice, or you will be battered by pixie-ness. Sorry, comments for this entry are now closed. To prevent comment spamming, you cannot comment on entries more than 15 days old. |